바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

한국 국가도서관의 주제별 체계화 방안 연구

A Study on the Subject-based Systematization of National Libraries in Korea

한국문헌정보학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2009, v.43 no.4, pp.5-27
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2009.43.4.005
윤희윤 (대구대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

2008년 8월 대통령 소속의 도서관정보정책위원회는 「도서관발전종합계획」에서 ‘국가 지식정보 활용을 위한 국가도서관 체계 재정립’의 구체적인 추진과제의 하나로 국가를 대표하는 주제별 전문도서관(과학기술, 농학, 의학, 법률, 환경) 건립 등을 제시하였다. 이에 본 연구는 예비연구로 수행한 ‘주요 국가의 주제별 국가도서관 체계 및 격차 분석’에 기반하여 국가도서관의 주제별 체계화 모형(국립중앙도서관 중심의 집중형 체계화, 수평적 연계형 체계화, 중장기 전략형 체계화)을 정밀 검토하고 바람직한 방안을 제안하였다.

keywords
국가도서관, 국립도서관, 국립중앙도서관, 국가도서관 체계, 주제별 국가도서관, National Library, National Library of Korea, Systematization of National Libraries, Subject-based National Library

Abstract

The Library and Information Policy Committee announced a national comprehensive plan for all libraries in August, 2008. The plan includes the re-establishment of a subject-based national library system as one of the major policy challenges. Based on the preceding study (an analysis on systematization and the gaps in subject-based national libraries in major countries), this paper proposed three models: a centralized model focused on the NLK, a horizontally-linked model, and a long-term strategic model for subject-based national library systematization in Korea.

keywords
국가도서관, 국립도서관, 국립중앙도서관, 국가도서관 체계, 주제별 국가도서관, National Library, National Library of Korea, Systematization of National Libraries, Subject-based National Library

참고문헌

1.

國公立大學圖書館協議會. 2008. ꡔ國立大學圖書館報ꡕ, 26: 321.

2.

대통령 소속 도서관정보정책위원회. 2008. ꡔ도서관발전종합계획: 2009∼2013ꡕ. 서울: 동위원회.

3.

윤희윤. 2006. ꡔ학술연구정보서비스(RISS)가 연구성과에 미치는 기여도 평가 및 핵심지표 개발ꡕ. 서울: 한국교육학술정보원.

4.

윤희윤. 2007. 국내 공공도서관의 정책적 현안과 과제. ꡔ한국문헌정보학회지ꡕ, 41(2): 31-54.

5.

윤희윤. 2009. 주요 국가의 주제별 국가(급)도서관 체계 및 격차 분석. ꡔ한국도서관․정보학회지ꡕ, 40(3): 69-96.

6.

한국교육학술정보원. 2005. 국내외 연구중심대학의 도서관 현황과 KERIS의 주요 사업방향: 2005 년도 전국대학도서관대회. [cited 2009.5.5]. <www.riss4u.net/etc/fileDownLoad.jsp?file_name=03_2005_library.pdf>.

7.

한국교육학술정보원. 2006. ꡔ해외 학술정보 수요 및 이용행태조사를 위한 설문분석 결과ꡕ. 서울: 한국교육학술정보원.

8.

e-나라지표. 2009. “출판현황” [online]. [cited 2009.5.15]. <http://www.index.go.kr/egams/stts/jsp/potal/stts/PO_STTS_IdxMain.jsp?idx_cd=1648>.

9.

Akie, Ronald & Joel Baron. 2004. “The Demand Side of STM Publishing : Understanding Value Creation in New Market Units.” Learned Publishing, 17(3): 211-217.

10.

CISTI. 2007. CISTI Strategic Plan 2005-2010 : Exploiting Information for Innovation. Ottawa: Minister of Industry.

11.

European Union. 2008. Statistical Portrait of the European Union 2008. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

12.

Forfás. 2005. Survey of Research and Development in the Higher Education Sector 2004. Dublin: Forfás.

13.

Hook, Peter A., Katy Börner, and Kevin Boyack. 2005. “Mapping the Disciplinary Diffusion of Information.” [online]. [cited 2009.4.18]. <http://www.ccsr.uiuc.edu/UCS2005/audiosections/PPTwithoutMP3/HookPeter.ppt>.

14.

Houghton, John. 2000. Economics of Scholarly Communication : A Discussion Paper. Canberra: Center for Strategic Economic Studies Victoria University.

15.

Houghton, John W., Colin Steele, and Margaret Henty. 2003. Changing Research Practices in the Digital Information and Communication Environment. Canberra: Department of Education.

16.

Japan Book Publishers Association. “An Introduction to Publishing in Japan 2006-2007.”[online]. [cited 2009.6.10]. <http://www.jbpa.or.jp/en/pdf/pdf01.pdf>.

17.

Japanese Economy Division. 2005. “Japanese Publishing Industry.” JETRO Japan Economic Monthly, [online]. [cited 2009.5.15]. <http://www.jetro.go.jp/en/reports/market/pdf/2005_42_r.pdf>.

18.

Leydesdorff, Loet & Ismael Rafols. 2007. “A Global Map of Science Based on the ISI Subject Categories.” [online]. [cited 2009.6.20]. <http://users.fmg.uva.nl/lleydesdorff/map06/texts/map06.pdf>.

19.

Moya-Anegón, Félix et al. 2004. “A New Technique for Building Maps of Large Scientific Domains Based on the Co-citation of Classes and Categories.” Scientometrics, 61(1): 129-145.

20.

Rostum, Hussein. 2003. The Information Imperative : A Framework for Measuring Impacts of STM Information Services and STM Information Organizations. Ottawa: CISTI.

21.

Rosvall, Martin and Carl T. Bergstrom. 2008. “Maps of Random Walks on Complex Networks Reveal Community Structure.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(4): 1118-1123.

22.

Stark, W. and A.E. Bourgeois. 2003. Building theSTM Knowledge Infrastructure : A Feasibility Study. Toronto: Federal Science eLibrary.

23.

Tenopir, Carol & D.W. King. 1998. “Designing the Future of Electronic Journals with Lessons Learned from the Past : Economic and Use Patterns of Scientific Journals.” Journal of Electronic Publishing, 4(2) [cited 2009.4.19]. <http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/04-02/king.html>.

24.

Tenopir, Carol and Donald King. 2000. Towards Electronic Journals : Realities for Scientists, Librarians and Publishers. Washington. D.C.: SLA Publishing.

25.

World Trade Organization. 2007. International Trade Statistics. Geneva: WTO.

26.

文部科學省 科学技術政策研究所 科学技術指標プロジェクトチーム 編. 2004. ꡔ科学技術 指標 : 日本の科學技術の體系的分析ꡕ. 東京 : 文部科学省.

27.

歳 森敦. 2004. 日本国内における学術雑誌の購読状況:電子ジャーナルを中心に. [cited 2009.5.15]. <http://www.kc.tsukuba.ac.jp/colloqium/040715.pdf>.

28.

歳森 敦 外. 2005. ꡔ電子情報環境下における科学技術情報の蓄積・流通の在り方に関す る調査研究ꡕ. 東京 : 国立国会図書館.

한국문헌정보학회지