-검정.jpg){kind=logo}
- 권한신청
- P-ISSN1225-598X
- E-ISSN2982-6292
A Study on Feature Analysis of Archival Metadata Standards in the Records Lifecycle
A Study on Feature Analysis of Archival Metadata Standards in the Records Lifecycle
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
Abstract
Metadata schemas are well recognized as one of the important technological components for archiving and preservation of digital resources. However, a single standard is not enough to cover the whole lifecycle for archiving and preserving digital resources. This means that we need to appropriately select metadata standards and combine them to develop metadata schemas to cover the whole lifecycle of resources (or records). Creating a unified framework to understand the features of metadata standards is necessary in order to improve metadata interoperability that covers the whole resource lifecycle. In this study, the author approached this issue from the task-centric view of metadata, proposing a Task model as a framework and analyzing the feature of archival metadata standards. The proposed model provides a new scheme to create metadata element mappings and to make metadata interoperable. From this study, the author found out that no single metadata standard can cover the whole lifecycle and also that an in-depth analysis of mappings between metadata standards in accordance with the lifecycle stages is required. The author also discovered that most metadata standards are primarily resource-centric and the different tasks in the resource lifecycle are not reflected in the design of metadata standard data models.
- keywords
- Archival Metadata Standard, Metadata Interoperability, Preservation, Records Lifecycle, Task Model
참고문헌
Baca, M. 2003. “Practical Issues in Applying Metadata Schemas and Controlled Vocabularies to Cultural Heritage Information.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 36(3-4): 47-55.
Baek, Jae-eun and Sugimoto, S. 2007. Selection Guidelines for Preservation Method of Digital Resources. [online] [cited 2013. 2. 15.]<http://www.tulips.tsukuba.ac.jp/limedio/dla m/M93/M932902/9.pdf>
Baek, Jae-eun and Sugimoto, S. 2010. “Feature Analysis of Metadata Schemas for Records Management and Archives from the Viewpoint of Records Lifecycle.” Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 10(2): 75-100.
Baek, Jae-eun and Sugimoto, S. 2012. “A task-centric model for archival metadata schema mapping based on the records lifecycle.” International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies archive, 7(4): 269-282.
Chan, L.M. and Zeng, M.L. 2006. Metadata Interoperability and Standardization-A Study of Methodology Part 1. D-Lib Magazine, 12(6). [online] [cited 2013. 2. 15.]<http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june06/chan/06chan.html>
Chen, Y.N., Chen, S.J. and Lin, S.C. 2003. A metadata lifecycle model for digital libraries:methodology and application for an evidence-based approach to library research. In: Proceedings of the World Library and Information Congress: 69th IFLA General Conference and Council, Berlin. [online] [cited 2013. 1. 20.] <http://www.citi.sinica.edu.tw/papers/sophy/117-F.pdf>
Day, M. 2001. Metadata for Digital Preservation: A Review of Recent Developments. In:Proceedings of the Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries: 5th European Conference (ECDL 2001), Darmstadt, Germany, 161-172. [online] [cited 2013. 2. 15.]<http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F3-540-44796-2_15.pdf>
Digital Preservation Coalition. 2006. Decision Tree for Selection of Digital Materials for Long-term Retention. [online] [cited 2013. 2. 15.]<http://www.dpconline.org/advice/preservationhandbook/decision-tree>
Dunsire, G. 2010. The Vocabulary Mapping Framework and its potential for improving metadata interoperability in the Semantic Web. In: Proceeding of the EUROVOC Conference, November 2010, Luxembourg.
Evans, J., Mckemmish, S. and Bhoday, K. 2005. “Create Once, Use Many Times: The Clever Use of Recordkeeping Metadata for Multiple Archival Purposes.” Archival Science, 2005(5): 17-42.
Haslhofer, B. and Klas, W. 2010. “A Survey of Techniques for Achieving Metadata Interoperability.”ACM Computing Surveys, 42(7): 1-37.
International Council on Archives. 2000. ISAD(G): General International Standard Archival Description - Second edition. [online] [cited 2013. 4. 30.]<http://www.ica.org/10207/standards/isadg-general-international-standard-archival-descriptio n-second-edition.html>
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. 2009. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records-Final Report. [online] [cited 2013. 2. 15.]<http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf>
International Organization for Standardization. 2006. ISO 23081-1:2006: Information and documentation - Records management processes - Metadata for records - Part 1: Principles.
International Organization for Standardization. 2009. ISO 23081-2:2009: Information and documentation - managing metadata for records - Part 2: Conceptual and implementation issues.
JISC. 2009. The Vocabulary Mapping Framework (VMF): an introduction. [online] [cited 2013. 2. 15.]<http://www.doi.org/VMF/documents/VocabularyMappingFrameworkIntroductionV1.0(091212).pdf>
National Archives and Records Administration. [n.d.]. Preservation Programs at the National Archives. [online] [cited 2013. 1. 20.] <http://www.archives.gov/preservation/internal/>
National Archives of Australia. 2006; 2010; 2011. AGLS Metadata: Australian Government Implementation Manual (Version 3.0). [online] [cited 2013. 2. 15.]<http://www.naa.gov.au/Images/AGLS%20Manual%203.0%20-%20most%20recent%20revi sion%2030%20September%202011_tcm16-49605.pdf>
National Archives of Australia. 2008. Australian Government Recordkeeping Metadata Standard (Version 2.0). [online] [cited 2013. 5. 1.]<http://www.naa.gov.au/Images/AGRkMS_Final%20Edit_16%2007%2008_Revised_tcm16-47131.pdf>
National Archives of Australia. 2010. AGLS Metadata Standard Part 1-Reference Description (Version 2.0). [online] [cited 2013. 5. 1.]<http://www.agls.gov.au/pdf/AGLS%20Metadata%20Standard%20Part%201%20Reference %20Description.PDF>
National Archives of Australia. 2011. Australian Government Recordkeeping Metadata Standard Implementation Guidelines (Version 2.0). [online] [cited 2013. 5. 1.]<http://www.naa.gov.au/Images/AGRkMS%20Implementation%20Guidelines_tcm16-50156. pdf>
Nilsson, M., Baker, T., Johnston, P. and DCMI. 2008. The Singapore Framework for Dublin Core Application Profiles. [online] [cited 2013. 1. 20.]<http://dublincore.org/documents/singapore-framework>
OCLC/RLG Working Group on Preservation Metadata. 2001. Preservation Metadata for Digital Objects: A Review of the State of the Art. [online] [cited 2013. 3. 9.]<http://www.oclc.org/resources/research/activities/pmwg/presmeta_wp.pdf>
PREMIS Editorial Committee. 2012. PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata, version 2.2. [online] [cited 2013. 3. 9.]<http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v2/premis-2-2.pdf>
Shimazu, K., Arisawa, T. and Saito, I. 2006. Interdisciplinary contents management using 5W1H interface for metadata. In: Proceeding of IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'06), 909-912.
The Library of Congress. 2002. Encoded Archival Description (EAD). [online] [cited 2013.4. 30.] <http://www.loc.gov/ead>
Zeng, M.L. 1999. “Matadata Elements for Object Description and Representation: A Case Report from a Digitized Historical Fashion Collection Project.” American Society for Information Science, 50(13): 1193-1208.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수